Your FTP/MAP/AC/NM improvements

Would be nice to know how much your FTP/MAP/AC/NM and weight improved after completing what training plan.

I wish we had that power. There is really no way to predict improvement for any given plan because response to any given dose of training is highly individualistic. The best path for improvement is to have a plan which jibes with your goals, fitness level and geared to your training availability.

2 Likes

i mean You ve completed some plan and Your gain was or you lost 5kg or You ve completed some race with best result

Oh sorry, I misunderstood. I’m sure there’s lots of Knights out there that will share their gains (4DP), weight loss, and race results.

1 Like

@Dmytro_scott are you asking for a reporting metric post completion that summarizes your achievements or goals or something that talks about what people normally expect?

Yes on providing a training plan summary. That would be awesome for us to build and provide to athletes.

The second part is “It Depends”… Everyone is different, on different levels of fitness, so generalizing outcomes for training plans is almost impossible to do. For instance, we could take someone who is untrained and put them on a 12 week plan and they would get amazing results. However, a person that has been training for 5 years will see lower results. Or, some people are highly trainable and some of us struggle for the small gains we get. Results are all based on the individual, how they fuel themselves, how quickly they can recover, and even their age.

i understand all that. but we all can share results and write some short pre history. Even badass has bad days-)

Oh, okay. So in my past experience, this is what the training plans have done for me. I usually can’t do advanced right from the beginning so I do something in the medium level for 12 weeks.

Baseline coming off the couch 235 FTP, 315 MAP, 475 AC, 1100 NM

12 week plan with about 4 to 6 hours of cycling.

265 FTP, 345 MAP, 510 AC, 1300 NM. Weight loss 3kg

12 week advanced plan with up to 8 hours of training

295 FTP, 385 MAP, 595 AC, 1400 NM. Weight loss 3kg

To hit a 315 or 320 FTP I would have to really start ramping up my long distance rides and then focusing heavily on 3 x 20 minutes and things like that. But, my NM starts to really suffer as FTP goes up my NM starts going down. I am probably not fueling correctly.

2 Likes

awesome! brilliant! that what i was talking about!

1 Like

Here goes then (one reason I think this is a risky thread is once you’ve done this for a while it’s not a world of ‘gains’ necessarily - but perhaps that’s needed for visibility of what works for some)

Baseline after 18m of using another platform, and having started getting used to SUF FF
03/05/2019 849 444 304 240

12 week’ish custom plan with STR about 6 to 9 hours of cycling.(plus some fun MTB at times)
19/08/2019 922 353 284 232 - weight static at overweight

12 week’ish custom plan with STR about 6 to 9 hours of cycling.(less MTB)
16/11/2019 822 398 283 228 - weight up 1kg - slightly more overweight

8 week custom plan, then 4 week targetted (self developed MAP) plan
05/02/2020 871 418 291 233 - weight down 1kg still overweight)

12 week self developed plan (up to 10hr/week - occasional longer weekend rides in there pushing over 10 total for the week)
08/05/2020 893 422 304 240 - weight down 2kg (and I ripped my guts out on this one even more than normal if that’s possible - as i could see i was heading for close to last years numbers, but couldn’t get that one measly watt more)

I have no idea whether I can improve these numbers or not - possibly if I didn’t work maybe. More time dedicated to coaching myself and doing things in an even more structured way would maybe get my a few watts on ftp

1 Like

This is quite timely for me as I did Half Monty yesterday - I’m planning a Full Frontal on Friday and I’ve found that doing HM during the taper really helps with getting the targets right for pacing purposes.

Last year was a bit of a bust for me in terms of cycling; lots of life stuff got in the way and my fitness declined from where it had been. I did a FF in July 2019 and got the following numbers:

946 409 268 212

That represented a drop from my best FTP/MAP, which were around 240/330. I managed to start training consistently again around January and did FF in early April, getting the following results:

990 433 305 241

I’ve done a 12 week training plan (Advanced Mountainous Gran Fondo) since then. I wouldn’t say that I’ve followed it perfectly - I had a crash about halfway through which limited my riding for a couple of weeks, and I lightened the load at the end of the plan after feeling a bit burned out (not necessarily overtraining, but life in general). After doing HM, my numbers now look like this:

990 433 330 264

If I can maintain those numbers during FF (and hopefully add a little to the AC figure) then that will represent my best showing ever. What it shows, in my view, is that consistent training absolutely does get results; I am not a naturally sporty person but I am pleased with these numbers and am excited to see what happens next. I’m keen to see if I can manage another similar increase after following another 12 week plan more closely - if I can get to FTP/MAP of about 275/350, I’d start to edge closer to the magic 4W/kg figure on FTP that’s been a long-time target of mine.

1 Like

Wow on the massive increases.

And re “I’m planning a Full Frontal on Friday”
Good luck sir

Martin.

1 Like

10% every 3 months (twice). Some going !!

1 Like

For me, that’s reasonable for 6 months of focused training. The hard part if finding 6 back to back months for focused training. After that, the gains are miserably hard to get. Also, I’m a bigger rider with a bigger power output I guess. So, those numbers look good until I add my 90kg of weight to it.

Thanks @aaron.johnson - so would you say that baseline is a detrained baseline but you’d expect to normally get up there with a decent 6m block.

And it’s then that we find that numbers don’t necessarily go up?

That would certainly chime with me, I can structure things all which way and have done for a while now, but the numbers (yes they’re just numbers) rarely change much.

As Sir Aaron said, training tends to be an exercise in diminishing returns - noob gainz are great fun because you progress quickly, but at some point you’ll reach a level where you either need to devote much more time to training to see substantial improvements, or decide to focus on one aspect of your power profile (so you can train your FTP and see results, but that’ll be at the expense of your NM, or similar).

I have seen someone who has done multiple Ironmans (Ironmen?) and been to Kona say that becoming that good at endurance sports (i.e. racing well at age group level) is not necessarily rocket science; it’s about packing in very large volumes of training (i.e. 20-30 hours a week) consistently and getting your recovery right. You can do it on less and some do it on much less, but progressing in terms of numbers is easier when you’ve got that much time to train purely because of the way you can stimulate physical changes without going too deep in any given session. For most of us, of course, that’s not practical.

2 Likes

@Sir_Martin that is just my experience. Usually I make great gains in 6 months and then I have to focus more on volume, recovery, or completely changing up my routine to keep the body adapting. I always thought that at the 6 month mark, I would be better served with a coach to really try to boost my gains. After 9 months of consistent training I would scale things back and recovery from any nagging injuries I had or just change up my routine to help me mentally. I am no coach though. I’ve only done self training and coaching for about 30 years between running, triathlon and cycling.

Currently I struggle to just find 2 hours a week to do any training, so I need to step back and look at my priorities soon’ish. LOL.

1 Like

I retired from a different sport late last year, and subsequently managed a decent amount of miles over the winter in the UK but nothing too special - approx 180km per week was my aim, but regularly not achieved.

In Jan I’d had enough of the maintenance required to keep the bike going and missing miles due to weather / darkness and picked up a Kickr Core, plus a trial of Sufferfest. Jumped straight in to the 4DP as i’d been desperate to give it a go:

FTP: 294
MAP: 345
AC: 487
NM: 1272

Thereafter i had 6 weeks of really just enjoying the different videos. I had the TT plan on my calendar as a bit of guidance but i didn’t follow it rigorously.

Once lockdown hit my area i threw myself into a fairly structured mix of indoor and outdoor riding of my own design - helped by a new bike with power meter arriving just before. I have used Half Monty to set the baseline at the end March, then worked through a number of 4 week blocks repeating HM at the end of each rest week. Initially was two blocks base focus, as I was always an anaerobically stronger rower and weaker aerobically, it also seemed sensible to start there. :slight_smile:

Baseline. 04/04/20
MAP 461w
FTP 354w (20 min HR constrained avg power 286 / 173hr)
LTHR 189

End Block 1 02/05/20
MAP 474w
FTP 369w (20 min HR constrained avg power 297 / 175hr)
LTHR 187

End Block 2 30/05/20
MAP 486w
FTP 365w (20 min HR constrained avg power 287 / 180hr)
LTHR 190 (last minute avg 203 / 204 max)

The room in which i did the third test was 28c, and although nothing for a lot of people for somebody in Scotland it hit me hard! That’s my selected excuse for sub-standard HR constrained result.

For the last 2 blocks I shifted focus slightly to increase the intensity of my sessions away from being dominated by z2 rides to more muscular endurance / threshold / vo2max. I didn’t do a Half Monty at the end of the June, mostly because i felt gains would be slower to come by, and the numbers i was working to seemed like they were overestimates anyway so wanted more time to work on them.

This last block has been pretty effective, and hoping to step on when i do HM next week. Amount of training has been helped by my lack of commute, and is typically 11-13 hours per week. I had a great fit for the new bike back in March, which has contributed significantly to no injuries so training has been really pretty consistent.

On weight, i started just above 86kg, and weighed in at 81.4kg yesterday. I doubt I’ll ever be a hill climber, but I don’t live in the alps anyway.

1 Like

This ^^ - this has to be common - I think I made any improvements I was going to make when I did my first period on an indoor bike (using it to recover from an injury). After that it would need more volume and formality than I have. I did try the coach thing, but actually unless you have a fairly dedicated time it doesn’t change the bar facts that you’re not spending your days only focussed on bike training

Wowzers. Are you Matthew Pinsent? Amazing numbers.

1 Like